Fire and Gas Detection and Mitigation Systems

Keywords: Fire and gas, NFPA 72, IEC 61511, risk reduction, LOPA

This article is available in:  English. Please login to request translation.


Abstract:

Fire and Gas Detection systems are key components in the overall safety and operation of any production facility and its on-site personnel. These facilities have had serious safety problems over the years. Some recent statistics provided by the NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) reveals that between 1985 and 2004, there were 10 U.S. petroleum refinery fires with three or more deaths. In March of 2005, the BP Texas City Refinery explosion and fire killed 15 people and injured 200 others.

The Fire and Gas Detection system continuously monitors heat, smoke, temperature, and toxic or combustible gas levels with the use of dedicated field devices. If any combination of them (within a zone) exceeds a pre-determined level, the system will raise the alarm and take automatic action to close operating valves and damper doors, release extinguishants, cut off electrical power and vent dangerous gases.

Fire and Gas Detection Systems are included under the provisions of the OSHA 1910.119 (PSM) Regulation, Subpart L (Fire Protection) as they are intended to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable or explosive chemicals. The NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm Code addresses the application, installation, location, performance and maintenance of fire alarm systems and their components. However, Gas Detection Systems are not included, in spite of the fact that detection of a release is the cornerstone upon which subsequent fire-fighting action depends.

Work is in progress by the ISA S84 WG 6 Committee to treat Fire & Gas Detection and Mitigation Systems as Safety Instrumented Systems in the process sector, and require that an appropriate SIL (Safety Integrity Level) rating or RRF (Risk Reduction Factor),per IEC 61511 performance criteria, be achieved. Considering the importance of these systems to maintaining the operational integrity of the overall facility, this work is absolutely essential.

This paper discusses the application of Fire and Gas Detection and Mitigation Systems in process facilities, and the capabilities of these systems to meet the requirements of both NFPA 72, and a Safety Integrity Level of SIL 1 or 2, in compliance with IEC 61511. © 2010 Inside Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Volume: 2010   Issue: 1
EUR 5.09
(Pages: 9, Words: 3396)

Readers of this article also bought

Other articles by Lawrence Beckman:

Articles by keywords

2oo4d accident accidents accumulative risk actuators alarm annunciator alarp ansi/isa s.84 api 521 architecture asil asset management audit automatic code generation automatic documentation automotive availability bayesian updating bpcs buncefield burner management system caex certification common cause common cause failures communication compliance component failure analysis consequence matrix content management control cost reduction cost-benefit analysis cots demand mode diagnostic coverage diagnostics digital valve controller documentation emc emergency shutdown system emi en 50402 en 746 en/iec 60079–29–1 failure incident failure rate data failure rates fieldbus fire and gas fired equipment fmeda foundation sif full stroke functional modules functional safety functional safety management gas detection gas sensors gas turbine global risk hardware hazard and operability analysis hazard and operability study hazop hazop templates heterogeneous hipps iec 61131 iec 61131-3 iec 61508 iec 61511 iec 62061 iec 61508 incident investigation independent protection layer instrumentation and control iso 26262 knowledge-based system layer of protection layer of protection analysis life cycle lifecycle management liquiphant lock-up valve lopa management management of change markov memory metrological standards microcontroler mttfs namur 93 nfpa 72 oem online changes operator over spill protection overspeed protection p&id flowchart paag partial stroke partial stroke testing pha prior use process hazop process risk process safety proof test interval proof testing proven in use qs9000 quality data quality management redundancy regulations reliability reliability data reliability engineering reliability program requirements definition review risk graphs risk matrix risk reduction risk reduction factor rule-based system safe-t-core safeguard safety safety goal safety instrumented function safety instrumented system safety instrumented systems safety integrity level safety lifecycle self-declaration sensor poisoning sif signature test sil sil determination methods sil evaluation sil-capability silstroke sil verification sis sis design software solenoid valves spurious trip standardisation state transition modelling sulphur recovery tank farm test bench texas city thermal burner third party tier 1 tolerable risk training tridefine type testing valve testing valves vdi 2180 verification